# Question about the axes orientation in the newer pybamm version

**URL:** <https://pybamm.discourse.group/t/question-about-the-axes-orientation-in-the-newer-pybamm-version/231>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [12 March 2025 23:59 UTC](https://pybamm.discourse.group/t/question-about-the-axes-orientation-in-the-newer-pybamm-version/231 "2025-03-12T23:59:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![appana.3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b782af/32.png) [@appana.3](https://pybamm.discourse.group/u/appana.3)\
**Post date:** [12 March 2025 23:59 UTC](https://pybamm.discourse.group/t/question-about-the-axes-orientation-in-the-newer-pybamm-version/231/1 "2025-03-12T23:59:21Z")

</div>

Hi, in the older pybamm version (24.1), electrode height corresponded to the Z-axis while electrode width corresponded to the Y-axis. Did it get flipped in the newer version (v25.1)?

I am using the same codes and I see exactly flipped results

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8dc957/32.png) [@Marc](https://pybamm.discourse.group/u/Marc)\
**Post date:** [13 March 2025 13:15 UTC](https://pybamm.discourse.group/t/question-about-the-axes-orientation-in-the-newer-pybamm-version/231/2 "2025-03-13T13:15:32Z")

</div>

Hi @appana.3, this bug has been fixed and will be released with the upcoming version of PyBaMM. It is available right now on the develop branch of PyBaMM.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![appana.3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b782af/32.png) [@appana.3](https://pybamm.discourse.group/u/appana.3)\
**Post date:** [13 March 2025 15:53 UTC](https://pybamm.discourse.group/t/question-about-the-axes-orientation-in-the-newer-pybamm-version/231/3 "2025-03-13T15:53:34Z")

</div>

Okay, thank you for the clarification!
